高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Effectiveness and safety of extracorporeal shock wave treatment for low back pain:a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

单位: [1]China Japan Friendship Hosp, Ctr Osteonecrosis & Joint Preserving & Reconstruct, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China [2]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sun Yat sen Mem Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Guangzhou, Peoples R China [3]China Japan Friendship Hosp, Ctr Osteonecrosis & Joint Preserving & Reconstruct, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 2 Yinghuadong Rd, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy Low back pain Systematic review and meta-analysis

摘要:
This meta-analysis was designed to assess the effectiveness and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for patients with low back pain (LBP). Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane's library, PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data were searched until December 2019 to identify studies assessing the effectiveness and safety of EPSW for LBP. The prime outcome is pain intensity measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) or numeric rating scale (NRS). Other outcomes included functional status, quality of life, psychological outcomes measured by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), as well as the adverse events. Mean differences (MD) were calculated for continuous outcomes, while odd ratios (OR) were calculated for binary outcomes. Revman 5.3 software was used for statistical analysis. Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were finally included in this meta-analysis. The pooled mean difference in post-treatment pain scores was-2.37 (P <0.0001), indicating that post-treatment pain scores was significantly higher by 2.37 in control group than in ESWT group. At a mean follow-up time of 4-6 weeks, the pooled mean difference in ODI scores was-14.10 (P <0.00001), indicating that the pooled mean difference of post-treatment ODI scores was 14.10 higher in control group than in ESWT group. The use of ESWT is effective in alleviating pain and improving the general functional state for patients with LBP. However, more evidence was needed to verify its safety.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 医学:内科 4 区 康复医学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 医学:内科 4 区 康复医学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
Q3 REHABILITATION Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
最新[2023]版:
Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Q3 REHABILITATION

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均[2021-2025] 出版当年[2020版] 出版当年五年平均[2016-2020] 出版前一年[2019版] 出版后一年[2021版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]China Japan Friendship Hosp, Ctr Osteonecrosis & Joint Preserving & Reconstruct, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]China Japan Friendship Hosp, Ctr Osteonecrosis & Joint Preserving & Reconstruct, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China [3]China Japan Friendship Hosp, Ctr Osteonecrosis & Joint Preserving & Reconstruct, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 2 Yinghuadong Rd, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:1320 今日访问量:0 总访问量:816 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)