Liver failure determines the outcome in patients of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF): comparison of APASL ACLF research consortium (AARC) and CLIF-SOFA models
单位:[1]Department of Hepatology and Transplant, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences (ILBS), New Delhi 110 070, India [2]Department of Hepatology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh [3]Department of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India [4]Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Selayang Hospital, Kepong, Malaysia [5]Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St John Medical College, Bangalore, India [6]Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [7]Department of Infectious Disease, Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院[8]Liver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China 临床科室国家中心肝病分中心首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院[9]Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India [10]Department of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India [11]Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan [12]Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Center for Liver and Digestive Diseases, Chuncheon, Gangwon-Do, Republic of Korea [13]Department of Hepatology, Nork Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases, Yerevan, Armenia [14]Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore [15]Department of Gastroenterology, Dayanand Medical College, Ludhiana, India [16]Division of Hepatology, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia [17]Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan [18]Department of Internal Medicine, Egyptian Liver Research Institute and Hospital, Cairo, Egypt [19]Department of Hepatology, Cardinal Santos Medical Center, Manila, Philippines [20]Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey [21]Cardinal Santos Medical Center, Metro Manila, Philippines [22]The Institute of Translational Hepatology, Beijing, China [23]Sir Salimur Rehman Medical College, Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh [24]Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India [25]Inserm, U1149, Centre de recherche sur l’Inflammation (CRI), UMR_S 1149, Labex INFLAMEX, Universite´ Paris Diderot Paris 7, Paris, France [26]Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences (ILBS), New Delhi 110 070, India [27]Department of Clinical Research, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences (ILBS), New Delhi 110 070, India
Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a progressive disease associated with rapid clinical worsening and high mortality. Early prediction of mortality and intervention can improve patient outcomes. We aimed to develop a dynamic prognostic model and compare it with the existing models. A total of 1402 ACLF patients, enrolled in the APASL-ACLF Research Consortium (AARC) with 90-day follow-up, were analyzed. An ACLF score was developed in a derivation cohort (n = 480) and was validated (n = 922). The overall survival of ACLF patients at 28 days was 51.7%, with a median of 26.3 days. Five baseline variables, total bilirubin, creatinine, serum lactate, INR and hepatic encephalopathy, were found to be independent predictors of mortality, with AUROC in derivation and validation cohorts being 0.80 and 0.78, respectively. AARC-ACLF score (range 5-15) was found to be superior to MELD and CLIF SOFA scores in predicting mortality with an AUROC of 0.80. The point scores were categorized into grades of liver failure (Gr I: 5-7; II: 8-10; and III: 11-15 points) with 28-day cumulative mortalities of 12.7, 44.5 and 85.9%, respectively. The mortality risk could be dynamically calculated as, with each unit increase in AARC-ACLF score above 10, the risk increased by 20%. A score of ae<yen>11 at baseline or persisting in the first week was often seen among nonsurvivors (p = 0.001). The AARC-ACLF score is easy to use, dynamic and reliable, and superior to the existing prediction models. It can reliably predict the need for interventions, such as liver transplant, within the first week.
第一作者单位:[1]Department of Hepatology and Transplant, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences (ILBS), New Delhi 110 070, India [26]Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences (ILBS), New Delhi 110 070, India
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Department of Hepatology and Transplant, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences (ILBS), New Delhi 110 070, India [26]Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences (ILBS), New Delhi 110 070, India
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
A. Choudhury,A. Jindal,R. Maiwall,et al.Liver failure determines the outcome in patients of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF): comparison of APASL ACLF research consortium (AARC) and CLIF-SOFA models[J].HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL.2017,11(5):461-471.doi:10.1007/s12072-017-9816-z.
APA:
A. Choudhury,A. Jindal,R. Maiwall,M. K. Sharma,B. C. Sharma...&S. K. Sarin.(2017).Liver failure determines the outcome in patients of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF): comparison of APASL ACLF research consortium (AARC) and CLIF-SOFA models.HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL,11,(5)
MLA:
A. Choudhury,et al."Liver failure determines the outcome in patients of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF): comparison of APASL ACLF research consortium (AARC) and CLIF-SOFA models".HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL 11..5(2017):461-471