单位:[1]Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, State Key Lab Resp Dis, Guangzhou 515120, Guangdong, Peoples R China[2]Sichuan Univ, W China Hosp, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China四川大学华西医院[3]Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Coll Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xian 710049, Peoples R China[4]Shenyang Mil Command, Gen Hosp, Shenyang, Peoples R China[5]Shanghai Changzheng Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China[6]Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China[7]Beijing Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China[8]Guang Zhou First Municipal Peoples Hosp, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China[9]Zhejiang Univ, Coll Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China[10]Nanjing Mil Command, Nanjing Gen Hosp, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China[11]China Japan Friendship Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China[12]Shanghai Changhai Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of budesonide (BUD)/formoterol (FORM) compared with BUD, both administered by way of a dry powder inhaler (Turbuhaler*). Methods: This was a 6-month, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, double-dummy design study (NCT 00421122). Patients were randomized to either BUD/FORM 160/4.5 mu g, two inhalations twice daily, or BUD 200 mg, two inhalations twice daily. Improvement of lung function, daily symptoms, reliever use and health-related quality-of-life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] score) were compared between the two treatment groups. Results: A total of 308 patients with moderate to very severe COPD from 12 centers in China were randomized to BUD/FORM (n = 156) or BUD (n = 152). The primary endpoint, 1-hour post-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), in the BUD/FORM group improved by 0.18 L (from 0.83 L at baseline to 1.01 L) and this was significantly better (p<0.001) than the small increase (0.03 L) observed in the BUD group after 24 weeks' treatment. Increases in pre-dose and 15-min post-dose FEV1 together with 1-hour post-dose forced vital capacity were also significantly larger with BUD/FORM than BUD (p<0.001 for all). Compared with BUD alone, BUD/FORM improved COPD total symptom scores (-1.04 +/- 0.16 vs. -0.55 +/- 0.17; p = 0.03), reduced reliever use (-0.85 +/- 0.16 puffs/day vs. -0.31 +/- 0.16 puffs/day; p = 0.012) and improved health-related quality-of-life (mean change of total SGRQ score -4.5 points (p = 0.0182). Overall, both treatments were well tolerated. Conclusions: In Chinese patients with moderate to very severe COPD, fixed combination treatment with BUD/FORM resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in lung function, health-related quality-of-life, COPD symptoms and a reduction in reliever use, compared with BUD alone and both treatments were well tolerated. Treatment of BUD/FORM for milder patients with COPD and head to head comparison of Chinese and Caucasians in future studies will be helpful to expand upon the findings of the current clinical trial.
基金:
AstraZenecaAstraZeneca
语种:
外文
被引次数:
WOS:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2011]版:
大类|3 区医学
小类|3 区医学:内科3 区医学:研究与实验
最新[2025]版:
大类|4 区医学
小类|3 区医学:内科4 区医学:研究与实验
JCR分区:
出版当年[2010]版:
Q1MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNALQ2MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
最新[2023]版:
Q1MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNALQ3MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
第一作者单位:[1]Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, State Key Lab Resp Dis, Guangzhou 515120, Guangdong, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, State Key Lab Resp Dis, Guangzhou 515120, Guangdong, Peoples R China[*1]Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, State Key Lab Resp Dis, 151 Yanjiang Rd, Guangzhou 515120, Guangdong, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Zhong Nanshan,Zheng Jinping,Wen Fuqiang,et al.Efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol via a dry powder inhaler in Chinese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J].CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH and OPINION.2012,28(2):257-265.doi:10.1185/03007995.2011.636420.
APA:
Zhong, Nanshan,Zheng, Jinping,Wen, Fuqiang,Yang, Lan,Chen, Ping...&Li, Qiang.(2012).Efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol via a dry powder inhaler in Chinese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH and OPINION,28,(2)
MLA:
Zhong, Nanshan,et al."Efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol via a dry powder inhaler in Chinese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease".CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH and OPINION 28..2(2012):257-265