高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Clinical Outcomes of Bivalirudin Versus Heparin in Elderly Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

单位: [1]Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of DalianMedical University, Dalian City, China [2]Cardiac Center/Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, BeijingFriendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong’an Road,Beijing City 100053, People’s Republic of China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Bivalirudin Elderly Heparin Percutaneous coronary intervention

摘要:
Purpose The aim of this study was to explore the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods An electronic search was conducted for randomized controlled trials with outcomes of interest in the elderly (>= 65 years of age). Pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using random effects Der Simonian-Laird models were calculated. Primary outcomes were net adverse clinical events (NACE) and major bleeding events at 30 days. Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days. MACE, all-cause mortality, and NACE at 6-12 months were also examined. Results Eleven trials that randomized a total of 15,895 elderly patients undergoing PCI to bivalirudin versus heparin were included. At 30 days, bivalirudin was associated with a reduced risk of NACE (0.86 [0.75-0.99], p = 0.04), mainly driven by reduction in major bleeding events (0.66 [0.54-0.80], p < 0.0001), as compared with heparin. On subgroup analyses based on the use of GPI in the heparin arm, benefit of major bleeding associated with bivalirudin appeared to be equally evident when GPI was used as a bailout (0.66 [0.46-0.94], p = 0.02) versus routine (0.67 [0.51-0.88], p = 0.004) adjunctive therapy with heparin. Subgroup analyses stratified by clinical presentation showed that benefit of bivalirudin in reducing NACE was even more obvious in the elderly group presenting with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (0.76 [0.65-0.89], p = 0.0007), as compared with the overall (acute coronary syndrome or stable ischemic heart disease) group. No difference in MACE (0.94 [0.82-1.09], p = 0.42) was demonstrated between the two groups. Bivalirudin was associated with a similar risk of NACE (0.74 [0.39-1.42], p = 0.36) at 6 months and MACE (0.90 [0.68-1.19], p = 0.45) at 6-12 months, while a non-statistically significant trend toward lower all-cause mortality (0.70 [0.47-1.06], p = 0.09) at 1 year. Conclusion In elderly patients undergoing PCI, bivalirudin was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding events and the magnitude of benefit was not related to the use of GPI and irrespective of clinical presentation. Bivalirudin may reduce the NACE, particularly in elderly patients presenting with STEMI or in the setting of routine GPI use in the heparin arm, while no difference in MACE was demonstrated between the two groups.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 心脏和心血管系统 3 区 药学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 药学 4 区 心脏和心血管系统
JCR分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
最新[2023]版:
Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均[2021-2025] 出版当年[2018版] 出版当年五年平均[2014-2018] 出版前一年[2017版] 出版后一年[2019版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of DalianMedical University, Dalian City, China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

相关文献

[1]Clinical Outcomes of Bivalirudin Versus Heparin in Elderly Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [2]Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Elderly Patients with Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives [3]Evaluation of Bivalirudin-Associated Major Adverse Cardiac and Hemorrhagic Events in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients on Chronic Dialysis Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [4]Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Elderly Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Cohort Study [5]Thorombolytic Therapy with Rescue Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial [6]Thorombolytic therapy with rescue percutaneous coronary intervention versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial [7]Quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography assessment of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention [8]A risk score to predict postdischarge bleeding among acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: BRIC-ACS study [9]Antiplatelet effect, safety, and pharmacokinetics of vicagrel in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention [10]Combining Fractional Flow Reserve and Optical Coherence Tomography Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Two-vessel Intermediate Coronary Artery Lesions

资源点击量:1320 今日访问量:0 总访问量:816 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)