单位:[a]Vascular surgery department, Changhai hospital, the Second military medical university, Shanghai, China[b]Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, the Second military medical university, Shanghai, China[c]Vascular surgery department, the first affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China院本部南沙医院外科血管外科外科血管外科中山大学附属第一医院[d]Vascular surgery department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, the affiliated hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China临床科室心血管中心血管外科首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院[e]Vascular Surgery Department, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China[f]Vascular surgery department, Zhongshan Hospital, the affiliated hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Objectives: This study aims to report mid-term follow-up outcomes of a series of TAAD patients treated with TEVAR in China. Background: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been used to treat type A aortic dissection (TAAD) for years. However, by comparing public reports, their outcomes which were based on different sample sizes show inconsistency. Methods: Between January 2001 and December 2015, there were 56 patients with TAAD received TEVAR identified in 5 medical centers. The morphology changes and early and late outcomes were recorded and analyzed. Results: 56 patients (aged 38 to 80) with TAAD received TEVAR. The average follow-up period was 39.92 +/- 34.42 months (ranging from 11 to 140 months). 54 (96.43%) cases were technically successful. 1 patient died on day 2 after TEVAR because of stent graft migration during the procedure. There were 7 early events (within 30 days), including sudden death (1), cerebral infarction (3), stent graft migration (1), new dissection (1) and respiratory failure (1). The 30-day overall survival rate was 92.9%. 27 late events occurred during the follow-up: retrograde dissection (8), endoleak (5), coronary artery stenosis (3), cerebral infarction (3), new dissection (2), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (1), left ventricular pseudoaneurysm (1), stent graft migration (1), respiratory failure (1), supraventricular tachycardia (1) and pericardial effusion (1). The 5-year overall survival rate of this study was 80.9% and this rate reached 98.2% if aorta-related deaths were excluded. Conclusions: TEVAR could be an effective alternative for high-risk patients. However, issues resulted from postoperative complications still call for attention. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
第一作者单位:[a]Vascular surgery department, Changhai hospital, the Second military medical university, Shanghai, China[*1]Department of Vascular Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, CPLA, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai 200433, China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[a]Vascular surgery department, Changhai hospital, the Second military medical university, Shanghai, China[*1]Department of Vascular Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, CPLA, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai 200433, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Qingsheng Lu,Lei Liu,Guangqi Chang,et al.Mid-term outcomes from a multicenter study: Is TEVAR safe for ascending aortic dissection?[J].INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of CARDIOLOGY.2018,265:218-222.doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.095.
APA:
Qingsheng Lu,Lei Liu,Guangqi Chang,Xueming Chen,Hai Feng...&Zaiping Jing.(2018).Mid-term outcomes from a multicenter study: Is TEVAR safe for ascending aortic dissection?.INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of CARDIOLOGY,265,
MLA:
Qingsheng Lu,et al."Mid-term outcomes from a multicenter study: Is TEVAR safe for ascending aortic dissection?".INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of CARDIOLOGY 265.(2018):218-222