高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Difficult tracheal tube passage and subglottic airway injury during intubation with the GlideScope((R)) videolaryngoscope: a randomised, controlled comparison of three tracheal tubes*

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

单位: [1]Department of Anaesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [2]Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: airway management complications general anaesthesia laryngoscopes respiratory mucosa tracheal intubation videolaryngoscope

摘要:
Difficulty during placement of the tracheal tube is a known problem when intubating with the GlideScope((R)), which may lead to subglottic airway injury. This randomised, controlled clinical trial was designed to compare the resistance to passage of PVC (polyvinyl chloride), reinforced or BlockBuster tracheal tubes during intubation with the GlideScope. Secondary outcomes included the time taken to intubate and assessment of subglottic airway injury. One-hundred and seventy-seven patients were included in the data analysis. There was difficult tracheal tube passage (moderate or severe resistance) in 15 (21.4%) patients using the PVC tube compared with 4 (7.4%) and 1 (1.9%) using the reinforced and BlockBuster tubes, respectively (p = 0.003 for PVC vs. BlockBuster). The median (IQR [range]) time taken to intubate was 35 (27-45 [15-115]) s, 25 (20-27 [15-110]) s and 25 (22-30 [16-90]) s, respectively, (p < 0.001 for PVC vs. reinforced as well as PVC vs. BlockBuster). Subglottic airway injury, assessed using a fibreoptic bronchoscope after extubation, was higher with the PVC tube (p < 0.001) and the reinforced tube (p = 0.012) compared with the BlockBuster tube. We conclude that the BlockBuster tracheal tube is a better choice for orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope than PVC or reinforced tubes.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2016]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 麻醉学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 麻醉学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2015]版:
Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均[2021-2025] 出版当年[2015版] 出版当年五年平均[2011-2015] 出版前一年[2014版] 出版后一年[2016版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]Department of Anaesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:1320 今日访问量:0 总访问量:816 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)