单位:[1]Department of Psychiatry, Wenzhou Seventh People’s Hospital, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325005, China[2]Departmentof Psychiatry, Tianjin Anding Hospital, Tianjin, 300222, China[3]Institute of Mental Health, Jining Medical University,Jining, Shandong, 272067, China[4]Department of Psychiatry, Tianjin Anning Hospital, Tianjin, 300222, China[5]Department of Psychological Medicine, Chinese PLA (People’s Liberation Army) General Hospital, Chinese PLA(People’s Liberation Army) Medical School, Beijing, 100853, China[6]Department of Cardiology, China-JapanFriendship Hospital, Beijing, 100029, China[7]Department of Neurology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital,Tianjin, 300052, China
This study was proposed to compare the relative efficacy and tolerability of the second and third generation AEDs for refractory epilepsy. The 50% responder rate (RR) was selected as the efficacy outcome whereas the incidence of dizziness and somnolence were considered to evaluate the tolerability of AEDs. Odds ratio (OR) and their 95% credible interval (Crl) were obtained using a consistency model and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value was calculated to rank AEDs. Topiramate appeared to be significantly more effective than placebo, eslicarbazepine acetate, perampanel, pregabalin, zonisamide, gabapentin and lamotrigine with respect to the 50% RR (all OR > 1). Patients who were managed by eslicarbazepine acetate, perampanel, oxcarbazepine, topiramate and pregabalin were more likely to suffer from dizziness compared to those who receive placebo (all OR > 1). Perampanel, topiramate and pregabalin were related to elevated risks of somnolence compared to placebo (all OR > 1). Moreover, topiramate ranked highest with respect to 50% RR (SUCRA = 0.968) whereas levetiracetam appeared to have balanced efficacy and tolerability (SUCRA = 0.769, 0.743, 0.604 and 0.659). In conclusion, topiramate was the most efficacious AED, while levetiracetam was able to provide patients with balanced efficacy and tolerability.
基金:
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2011HM023]; Science and Technology Project of Higher Education of Shandong Province [J10LF01]; Development of Medical Science, the Technology project of Shandong Province [2011HZ011]; key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin, China [17JCZDJC35700]; Found of Wenzhou Health Bureau [2013B28]
第一作者单位:[1]Department of Psychiatry, Wenzhou Seventh People’s Hospital, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325005, China[2]Departmentof Psychiatry, Tianjin Anding Hospital, Tianjin, 300222, China[3]Institute of Mental Health, Jining Medical University,Jining, Shandong, 272067, China[4]Department of Psychiatry, Tianjin Anning Hospital, Tianjin, 300222, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Zhuo Chuanjun,Jiang Ronghuan,Li Gongying,et al.Efficacy and Tolerability of Second and Third Generation Anti-epileptic Drugs in Refractory Epilepsy: A Network Meta-Analysis[J].SCIENTIFIC REPORTS.2017,7:doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02525-2.
APA:
Zhuo, Chuanjun,Jiang, Ronghuan,Li, Gongying,Shao, Mingjing,Chen, Ce...&Jiang, Deguo.(2017).Efficacy and Tolerability of Second and Third Generation Anti-epileptic Drugs in Refractory Epilepsy: A Network Meta-Analysis.SCIENTIFIC REPORTS,7,
MLA:
Zhuo, Chuanjun,et al."Efficacy and Tolerability of Second and Third Generation Anti-epileptic Drugs in Refractory Epilepsy: A Network Meta-Analysis".SCIENTIFIC REPORTS 7.(2017)