Lack of evidence for a harmful effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on fracture risk among type 2 diabetes patients: a network and cumulative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
单位:[1]Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China[2]Department of Epidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA[3]Center for Pharmacoepidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA[4]Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China医技科室药学部首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院[5]Division of Nephrology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA[6]Hebrew Seniorlife Institute for Aging Research and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA[7]Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
AimTo evaluate the comparative effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on risk of bone fracture in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and were systematically searched from inception to 27 January 2016 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the outcome of fracture in patients with T2DM treated with SGLT2 inhibitors. Pairwise and network meta-analyses, as well as a cumulative meta-analysis, were performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ResultsA total of 38 eligible RCTs (10 canagliflozin, 15 dapagliflozin and 13 empagliflozin) involving 30384 patients, with follow-ups ranging from 24 to 160weeks, were included. The fracture event rates were 1.59% in the SGLT2 inhibitor groups and 1.56% in the control groups. The incidence of fracture events was similar among these three SGLT2 inhibitor groups. Compared with placebo, canagliflozin (OR 1.15; 95% CI 0.71-1.88), dapagliflozin (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.37-1.25) and empagliflozin (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.74-1.18) were not significantly associated with an increased risk of fracture. Our cumulative meta-analysis indicated the robustness of the null findings with regard to SGLT2 inhibitors. ConclusionsOur meta-analysis based on available RCT data does not support the harmful effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on fractures, although future safety monitoring from RCTs and real-world data with detailed information on bone health is warranted.
基金:
Indiana University Health-Indiana University School of Medicine Strategic Research Initiative
第一作者单位:[1]Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China[2]Department of Epidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA[3]Center for Pharmacoepidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[2]Department of Epidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA[3]Center for Pharmacoepidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA[*1]Department of Epidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, 1050 Wishard Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Tang H. L.,Li D. D.,Zhang J. J.,et al.Lack of evidence for a harmful effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on fracture risk among type 2 diabetes patients: a network and cumulative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM.2016,18(12):1199-1206.doi:10.1111/dom.12742.
APA:
Tang, H. L.,Li, D. D.,Zhang, J. J.,Hsu, Y. H.,Wang, T. S....&Song, Y. Q..(2016).Lack of evidence for a harmful effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on fracture risk among type 2 diabetes patients: a network and cumulative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM,18,(12)
MLA:
Tang, H. L.,et al."Lack of evidence for a harmful effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on fracture risk among type 2 diabetes patients: a network and cumulative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials".DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM 18..12(2016):1199-1206