高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Sedation and use of analgesics in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a double-blind comparison study of meperidine/midazolam, remifentanil/midazolam, and remifentanil alone

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

单位: [1]Department of Anesthesiology, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, District Fengtai, [2]Department of Anesthesiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, District Chaoyang, Beijing, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography remifentanil midazolam conscious sedation

摘要:
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of meperidine/midazolam, remifentanil, and remifentanil with midazolam for conscious sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Methods: 99 patients scheduled for ERCP were randomly allocated to be treated with either meperidine/midazolam (group C, n = 33), remifentanil (group R, n = 33), or the remifentanil plus midazolam (group RM, n = 33). In group C, intermittent intravenous meperidine and midazolam were administrated during the procedure; in group R, remifentanil was infused continuously at a rate of 0.2 mu g/kg/min for 5 minutes preoperatively, and decreased to 0.15 mu g/kg/min when the procedure began; in group RM, midazolam 0.02 mg/kg was administered preoperatively, and remifentanil was administered in the same manner as in group R. Blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, O-2-saturation, and bispectral index (BIS) of the patients were recorded. The modified Aldrete scores, operator satisfaction scores, and side effects of the patients were noted as were the operative duration and anesthesia duration. Results: The blood pressure of the patients were significantly increased in group R and group C compared to baseline, and no significant changes were noted in group RM. Group RM experienced the least variability in heart rate. BIS was decreased the most in groups C and RM. Hypoxemia was observed most frequently in group RM. Nausea and pain was highest in group C. Amnesia was most often reported in groups C and RM. Operator satisfaction and modified Aldrete of the patients was increased in group R. Conclusion: Both continuous remifentanil infusion alone and remifentanil plus midazolam provided satisfactory analgesia when used for sedation for ERCP, however, continuous remifentanil infusion alone resulted in increased operator satisfaction scores and expedited recovery room discharge.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2015]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 药学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 药学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2014]版:
Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
最新[2023]版:
Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均[2021-2025] 出版当年[2014版] 出版当年五年平均[2010-2014] 出版前一年[2013版] 出版后一年[2015版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]Department of Anesthesiology, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, District Fengtai,
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [2]Department of Anesthesiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, District Chaoyang, Beijing, China [*1]Department of Anesthesiology China-Japan Friendship Hospital 2# Yinghuadong Street, District Chaoyang, Beijing, 100029, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:1320 今日访问量:0 总访问量:816 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)