RETRACTED: Randomised clinical trial: the clinical efficacy and safety of an alginate-antacid (Gaviscon Double Action) versus placebo, for decreasing upper gastrointestinal symptoms in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in China (Retracted article. See vol. 48, pg. 1039, 2018)
BackgroundThere is a paucity of large-scale studies evaluating the clinical benefit of the Gaviscon Double Action (DA) alginate-antacid formulation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms. AimRandomised double-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group study to evaluate efficacy and safety of Gaviscon DA in reducing heartburn, regurgitation and dyspepsia symptoms in individuals with mild-to-moderate GERD in China. MethodsParticipants with symptomatic GERD (n=1107) were randomised to receive Gaviscon DA or placebo (two tablets four times daily) for seven consecutive days. The primary endpoint compared the change in Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) score for the GERD (heartburn + regurgitation) dimension between Gaviscon DA and placebo. Secondary endpoints compared the change in RDQ scores for individual heartburn, regurgitation and dyspepsia dimensions, overall treatment evaluation (OTE) scores and incidence of adverse events (AEs). ResultsMean RDQ GERD scores: 2.51 for Gaviscon DA and 2.50 for placebo at baseline; 1.25 for Gaviscon DA and 1.46 for placebo post treatment. Gaviscon DA was statistically superior to placebo in reducing GERD and dyspepsia RDQ scores [least-squares mean (LSM) difference: GERD -0.21, P<0.0001; dyspepsia -0.18, P=0.0004], despite a substantial placebo response. The Gaviscon DA group reported more favourable overall treatment responses than the placebo group across all OTE categories (P<0.0001). Superior relief of GERD symptoms was observed both in those with non-erosive and those with erosive reflux disease (LSM difference -0.14 [P=0.038] and -0.29 [P<0.0001] respectively). Incidence of AEs was similar in both groups. ConclusionGaviscon DA tablets provide effective and safe reduction in acid reflux and dyspepsia symptoms in Chinese individuals with mild-to-moderate GERD. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01869491
第一作者单位:[1]Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Ruijin Hosp, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Ruijin Hosp, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China[*1]Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Ruijin Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, 197 Rui Jin Er Rd, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Sun J.,Yang C.,Zhao H.,et al.RETRACTED: Randomised clinical trial: the clinical efficacy and safety of an alginate-antacid (Gaviscon Double Action) versus placebo, for decreasing upper gastrointestinal symptoms in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in China (Retracted article. See vol. 48, pg. 1039, 2018)[J].ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS.2015,42(7):845-854.doi:10.1111/apt.13334.
APA:
Sun, J.,Yang, C.,Zhao, H.,Zheng, P.,Wilkinson, J....&Yuan, Y..(2015).RETRACTED: Randomised clinical trial: the clinical efficacy and safety of an alginate-antacid (Gaviscon Double Action) versus placebo, for decreasing upper gastrointestinal symptoms in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in China (Retracted article. See vol. 48, pg. 1039, 2018).ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS,42,(7)
MLA:
Sun, J.,et al."RETRACTED: Randomised clinical trial: the clinical efficacy and safety of an alginate-antacid (Gaviscon Double Action) versus placebo, for decreasing upper gastrointestinal symptoms in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in China (Retracted article. See vol. 48, pg. 1039, 2018)".ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS 42..7(2015):845-854