Comparative analysis of the efficacy of early and late surgical intervention for acute spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 16 studies
单位:[1]Rehabilitation Center, Beijing Daxing District Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Beijing, 100076, China[2]Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing Tongren Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100073, China首都医科大学附属同仁医院[3]Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China临床科室康复医学科康复医学科首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院[4]Rehabilitation Department, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100020, China
Background: Spinal cord injuries (SCI) are a devastating condition and can lead to severe functional and psychosocial problems. However, the influence of the timing of the surgical intervention for acute SCI remains debated, with substantial variability in clinical practice. Thus, this study aims to compare the efficacy of early and late surgical intervention for acute SCI. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to January 10, 2021 was conducted for relevant studies that compared early and late acute SCI. Neurological outcomes were assessed by American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA). Early surgery was defined as the surgical intervention within 24 h after spinal injury. The primary outcome was the change of ASIA score from baseline to follow-up time after spinal injury. Second primary outcomes were clinical outcomes including neurological improvement rate, mortality, length of stay (LOS), charges ($), complications and ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS). All statistical analyses were performed using standard statistical procedures provided in Review Manager 5.2. Results: A total of 16 studies including 3977 SCI patients were identified finally. Our pooled results indicated that, compared with late surgery, patients who underwent early surgery experienced more ASIA score improvement, with pooled MDs of 2.32 points (95% CI 1.07-3.57; P = 0.0003) in total motor scores, 5.13 points (95% CI 3.94-6.32; P < 0.0001) in light touch scores, and 4.49 points (95% CI 2.22-6.76; P = 0.0001) in pin prick scores respectively. In addition, patients receiving early surgery experienced more total motor score after surgery (MD 3.30; 95% CI 0.82-5.79; P = 0.009). Patients who had early surgery also had higher neurological improvement rate (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.19-2.31; P = 0.003), shorter LOS (MD-4.77; 95% CI-7.42 to-2.12), less charges ($) (MD-0.33; 95% CI-0.43 to-0.22), lower incidence of complications (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.48-0.81), and higher AIS improvement rate (OR 1.71; 95% CI 1.20-2.44) respectively. Conclusions: Compared with late surgery, acute SCI patients who underwent early surgery experienced greater recovery after spinal injury, with better neurological improvement, shorter LOS, less charges and lower incidence of complications.
第一作者单位:[1]Rehabilitation Center, Beijing Daxing District Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Beijing, 100076, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[4]Rehabilitation Department, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100020, China[*1]Department, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Huajiadi Street No 6, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Qiu Yuanyuan,Chen Yaping,Xie Ying,et al.Comparative analysis of the efficacy of early and late surgical intervention for acute spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 16 studies[J].INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of SURGERY.2021,94:doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106098.
APA:
Qiu Yuanyuan,Chen Yaping,Xie Ying,Xie Hongzhi&Dong Jige.(2021).Comparative analysis of the efficacy of early and late surgical intervention for acute spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 16 studies.INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of SURGERY,94,
MLA:
Qiu Yuanyuan,et al."Comparative analysis of the efficacy of early and late surgical intervention for acute spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 16 studies".INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of SURGERY 94.(2021)