Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
单位:[1]Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center,Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China临床科室心血管中心心内科首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院[2]Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Health Center,Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China临床科室医保中心首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院[3]Beijing Key Laboratory of Metabolic Disorder-Related Cardiovascular Disease, Beijing, China
BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been considered the gold standard for left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus detection. Nevertheless, TEE may sometimes induce discomfort and cause complications. Cardiac computed tomography has been studied extensively for LAA thrombus detection. We performed this systemic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomography for LAA thrombus detection compared with TEE. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systemic search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from January 1977 to February 2021. Studies performed for assessment diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomography on LAA thrombus compared with TEE were included. Summary sensitivity, specificity, and posterior probability of LAA thrombus was calculated by using bivariate random-effects model. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was used for the quality assessment. A total of 27 studies involving 6960 patients were included in our study. The summary sensitivity of early imaging studies was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.79-0.99), and the specificity was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.92). The positive posterior probability was 19.11%, and the negative posterior probability was 0.16%. The summary sensitivity of delayed imaging studies was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.92-1.00), and the specificity was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00). The positive posterior probability was 95.76%, and the negative posterior probability was 0.12%. The delayed imaging method significantly improved the specificity (1.00 versus 0.89; P<0.05) and positive posterior probability (95.76% versus 19.11%; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac computed tomography with a delayed imaging is a reliable alternative to TEE. It may save the patient and health care from an excess TEE.
基金:
National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81800292]
第一作者单位:[1]Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center,Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center,Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China[2]Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Health Center,Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China[3]Beijing Key Laboratory of Metabolic Disorder-Related Cardiovascular Disease, Beijing, China[*1]Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Shandong Yu,Heping Zhang,Hongwei Li.Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis[J].JOURNAL of the AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION.2021,10(23):doi:10.1161/JAHA.121.022505.
APA:
Shandong Yu,Heping Zhang&Hongwei Li.(2021).Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.JOURNAL of the AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION,10,(23)
MLA:
Shandong Yu,et al."Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis".JOURNAL of the AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION 10..23(2021)