高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

The first case series analysis on efficacy of esmolol injection for in-hospital cardiac arrest patients with refractory shockable rhythms in China

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

单位: [1]Emergency Department, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China [2]General Surgery Department, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China [3]Cardiac Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China [4]Intensive Care Unit, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou, China [5]Cardiac Surgery Department, Qilu Hospital of ShanDong University, Jinan, China [6]Cardiac Care Unit, XiangTan Central Hospital, Xiangtan, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: cardiac arrest ventricular fibrillation pulseless ventricular tachycardia esmolol return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)

摘要:
Background: This study assessed the effects of esmolol injection in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) with refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF)/pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT). Methods: From January 2018 to December 2021, 29 patients with IHCA with refractory shockable rhythm were retrospectively reviewed. Esmolol was administered after advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS)-directed procedures, and outcomes were assessed. Results: Among the 29 cases, the rates of sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 24-h ROSC, and 72-h ROSC were 79%, 62%, and 59%, respectively. Of those patients, 59% ultimately survived to discharge. Four patients with cardiac insufficiency died. The duration from CA to esmolol infusion was significantly shorter for patients in the survival group (SG) than for patients in the dead group (DG) (12 min, IQR: 8.5-19.5 vs. 23.5 min, IQR: 14.4-27 min; p = 0.013). Of those patients, 76% (22 of 29) started esmolol administration after the second dose of amiodarone. No significant difference was observed in the survival rate between this group and groups administered an esmolol bolus simultaneously or before the second dose of amiodarone (43% vs. 64%, p = 0.403). Of those patients, 31% (9 of 29) were administered an esmolol bolus for defibrillation attempts <= 5, while the remaining 69% of patients received an esmolol injection after the fifth defibrillation attempt. No significant differences were observed in the rates of >= 24-h ROSC (67% vs. 60%, p = 0.73), >= 72-h ROSC (67% vs. 55%, p = 0.56), and survival to hospital discharge (67% vs. 55%, p = 0.56) between the groups administered an esmolol bolus for defibrillation attempts <= 5 and defibrillation attempts > 5. Conclusion: IHCA patients with refractory shockable rhythms receiving esmolol bolus exhibited a high chance of sustained ROSC and survival to hospital discharge. Patients with end-stage heart failure tended to have attenuated benefits from beta-blockers. Further large-scale, prospective studies are necessary to determine the effects of esmolol in patients with IHCA with refractory shockable rhythms.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 药学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 药学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
最新[2023]版:
Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均[2021-2025] 出版当年[2020版] 出版当年五年平均[2016-2020] 出版前一年[2019版] 出版后一年[2021版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]Emergency Department, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:1320 今日访问量:0 总访问量:817 更新日期:2025-05-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)