高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Prediction of exercise-induced desaturation in COPD patients without resting hypoxemia: a retrospective study

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

单位: [1]Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, China-Japan FriendshipHospital, Yinghuayuan East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, China [2]National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Beijing 100029, China [3]NationalClinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Beijing 100029, China [4]Fangzhuang Community Health Service Center, Capital Medical University,Beijing 100078, China [5]Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China [6]Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital,Beijing 100029, China [7]Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese Academyof Medical Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 6-min walk test Exercise-induced desaturation COPD assessment test CT defined Emphysema

摘要:
Background There is no universally accepted criterion for assessing exercise-induced desaturation (EID). The purpose of this study is to compare the two methods regularly used for determining EID in COPD patients, as well as to explore the risk factors and predictors related to EID. Methods The 6MWT was performed with continuous SpO(2) monitoring on patients with stable COPD. Using two methods (method A: "SpO(2rest)-SpO(2min) >= 4% and/or SpO(2min) < 90%", method B: "SpO(2rest)-SpO(2end) >= 4% and/or SpO(2end) < 90%") as EID determination criteria to assess the incidence of EID. The differences and consistency of the two methods are compared. Moreover, we collected data through the pulmonary function test, mMRC dyspnea score, COPD assessment test, BODE index and CT-defined emphysema. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors affecting the EID. For the parameters that predict EID in 6MWT, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed. Results The analysis included 124 patients. The overall incidence of EID was 62.1% by using method A as the criterion and 51.6% by method B. All of the EID patients found by method B were included in the EID patients identified by method A, as well as 13 new-EID patients. The difference in diagnostic outcomes between the two approaches was not statistically significant (P > 0.05), but they were in excellent agreement (Kappa = 0.807, P = 0.001). Logistic regression analyses found that DLCO SB% pred, DLCO/VA% pred, CAT score, mean density, PD15, emphysema volume and %LAA were significant determinants of the EID. For predicting EID, the ROC analysis produced AUC and cutoffs of 0.689 and 50.45% (DLCO SB% pred), 0.707 and 75.0% (DLCO/VA% pred), 0.727 and 15 points (CAT score), 0.691 and - 955.00HU (PD15), 0.671 and - 856.46HU (mean density), 0.668 and 338.14 ml (emphysema volume) and 0.656 and 7.63% (%LAA), respectively. Conclusions Two methods evaluating EID in this research are in a good agreement, method A can find more EID patients by focusing on SpO(2min.) When conditions are constrained, it is also sufficient to assess EID in COPD patients by method B. In terms of the predictors of EID, DLCO SB% pred, DLCO/VA% pred, CAT score and CT-defined emphysema are all statistically significant test variables to determine EID.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 呼吸系统
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 呼吸系统
JCR分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
最新[2023]版:
Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均[2021-2025] 出版当年[2020版] 出版当年五年平均[2016-2020] 出版前一年[2019版] 出版后一年[2021版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, China-Japan FriendshipHospital, Yinghuayuan East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, China [2]National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Beijing 100029, China [3]NationalClinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Beijing 100029, China [4]Fangzhuang Community Health Service Center, Capital Medical University,Beijing 100078, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, China-Japan FriendshipHospital, Yinghuayuan East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, China [2]National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Beijing 100029, China [3]NationalClinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Beijing 100029, China [7]Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese Academyof Medical Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:1320 今日访问量:0 总访问量:816 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)