高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

A novel extramedullary technique to guide femoral bone preparation in mobile unicompartmental knee arthroplasty based on tibial cut and overall alignment

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

单位: [1]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100029, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Surgical technique Extramedullary Radiologic Clinical outcome

摘要:
BackgroundThe mobile Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) implant has been widely used with an intramedullary guide for femoral preparation. We modified the femoral guide technique based on the tibial cut first and spacer block technique. This study was performed to determine the radiographic accuracy and early clinical outcomes of the extramedullary method.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 50 consecutive patients who underwent UKA using the extramedullary technique. An equal number of patients who underwent UKA with the conventional technique were matched as the control group. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in terms of the operating time, blood loss, range of motion, and Hospital for Special Surgery score. Radiographic accuracy was evaluated by the implant position and alignment in the coronal and sagittal planes.ResultsThe mean follow-up period was 39.76 5.77months. There were no differences in the postoperative Hospital for Special Surgery score, range of motion, or hip-knee-ankle angle between the two groups. The operating time in the extramedullary group was shorter than that in the conventional group (54.78 7.95 vs. 59.14 10.91min, respectively; p = 0.025). The drop in hemoglobin after 3days was only 12.34 +/- 4.98g/L in the extramedullary group which was less than that in the conventional group (p = 0.001). No significant differences were found in the postoperative coronal and sagittal angles between the two groups. Acceptable radiographic accuracy of the implant alignment and position was achieved in 92% of patients in the extramedullary group and 96% of patients in the conventional group.ConclusionsThe radiographic and clinical results of the extramedullary technique were comparable with those of the conventional technique with the advantage of no intramedullary interruption, less blood loss, a shorter operating time, and more rapid recovery. As the technique depends on the accurate tibial cut and overall alignment, we do not recommend it to surgeons without high volume experiences.Trial registration Retrospectively registeredLevel of evidenceIV, retrospective study

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 骨科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 骨科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2018]版:
Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
最新[2023]版:
Q1 ORTHOPEDICS

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均[2021-2025] 出版当年[2018版] 出版当年五年平均[2014-2018] 出版前一年[2017版] 出版后一年[2019版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100029, China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:1320 今日访问量:0 总访问量:816 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)