单位:[1]State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Viral Hepatitis Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou,[2]Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA,[3]Department of Virology and Liver Unit, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Nagoya, Japan,[4]Department of Infectious Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai,[5]Department of Infectious Diseases, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha,[6]Liver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China临床科室国家中心肝病分中心首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院
AimPrevious studies have reported that hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype is not a predictor of treatment response with nucleos(t)ide analog therapy. However, the impact of subgenotype on treatment response is unknown. The aim of this study is to identify the effect of HBV subgenotype on treatment response. MethodsIn this retrospective study, the derivation dataset comprised patients from the EFFORT study (NCT00962533) telbivudine monotherapy group; patients infected with genotypes B or C from the GLOBE (NCT00057265) and 015 (NCT00131742) studies formed the validation dataset. The HBV subgenotypes were determined using phylogenetic analysis based on the surface or overlapping polymerase gene. Molecular modeling was used to investigate relationships between positions of the substitutions within reverse transcriptase and genotypic resistance. ResultsOf the patients in the derivation dataset, 110, 24, 162, and 1 patients were classified as having HBV subgenotypes B2, C1, C2, or other, respectively, compared to 222, 146, 282, and 51 in the validation dataset, respectively. Patients infected with subgenotype C1 showed a higher virologic response rate and hepatitis B envelope antigen seroconversion rate, and lower genotypic resistance rate than those infected with subgenotypes B2 and C2. Patients with genotypic resistance to telbivudine with subgenotype C1 showed fewer secondary mutations. The crystal structure model of reverse transcriptase showed that these secondary mutations were located around the YMDD motif, which possibly influenced the chance of mutations at rtM204. ConclusionHepatitis B virus subgenotype C1 is associated with better antiviral response to nucleoside analogs in hepatitis B envelope antigen-positive patients than B2 and C2 subgenotypes. The exact mechanism needs to be explored further.
基金:
National Science and Technology Major Project by Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2017ZX10202202]; Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project by Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong province [201607020019, 201604020002]
第一作者单位:[1]State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Viral Hepatitis Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou,
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Viral Hepatitis Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou,[*1]Department of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Viral Hepatitis Research, Nanfang Hospital, SouthernMedical University, Guangzhou, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Sheng Shen,Xieer Liang,Kamal Hamed,et al.Effect of hepatitis B virus subgenotype on antiviral response in nucleoside-treated hepatitis B envelope antigen-positive patients[J].HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH.2018,48(2):134-143.doi:10.1111/hepr.12907.
APA:
Sheng Shen,Xieer Liang,Kamal Hamed,Yasuhito Tanaka,Katsumi Omagari...&Jian Sun.(2018).Effect of hepatitis B virus subgenotype on antiviral response in nucleoside-treated hepatitis B envelope antigen-positive patients.HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH,48,(2)
MLA:
Sheng Shen,et al."Effect of hepatitis B virus subgenotype on antiviral response in nucleoside-treated hepatitis B envelope antigen-positive patients".HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH 48..2(2018):134-143