Effects of body mass index or dosage on gastrointestinal disorders associated with extended-release metformin in type 2 diabetes: Sub-analysis of a Phase IV open-label trial in Chinese patients
单位:[1]Department of Endocrinology, Beijing Hospital of the Ministry of Health, Beijing, China[2]Department of Endocrinology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China[3]Department of Endocrinology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China中山大学附属第二医院[4]Department of Endocrinology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China临床科室内分泌科内分泌科首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院[5]Department of Endocrinology, Shanghai Pudong New Area People’s Hospital, Shanghai, China[6]Department of Endocrinology, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliate to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China[7]Department of Endocrinology, The Luhe Teaching Hospital of the Capital Medical University, Beijing, China[8]Department of Biostatistics, PPD Pharmaceutical Development (Beijing) Co, Ltd, Beijing, China[9]Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People’s Hospital, No 11, Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, 100044, China
Aim: To determine whether gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability of metformin monotherapy varies according to baseline BMI or at doses >1500 mg/day in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Methods: We performed a sub-analysis of the safety population from a prospective, multicenter, Phase IV open-label study in which 371 Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes received extended-release metformin monotherapy for 16 weeks. The incidence, severity and duration of GI adverse events (AEs) were compared between normal-weight (BMI <25 kg/m(2), n = 155) and overweight/obese (BMI >= 25 kg/m2, n = 216) patients. The primary objective was to determine whether baseline BMI affect the incidence, severity and duration of GI AEs, using Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test. Secondary objectives were to compare these factors according to final metformin dose (<= 1500 mg/day versus 2000 mg/day). Results: The proportion of patients who reported >= 1 GI AE did not differ significantly between BMI groups (25.2% of the normal-weight group versus 21.3% of the overweight/obese group; p = 0.3840). Patients who reported GI AEs in the two BMI groups experienced similar GI AE severity (p = 0.5410), mean duration (p = 0.3572) and duration distribution (p = 0.1347). There was no significant difference in GI AE severity and duration between metformin dosage groups (<= 1500 mg/day versus 2000 mg/day). Conclusions: Newly-diagnosed Chinese type 2 diabetes patients of normal weight are no more likely than overweight/obese patients to suffer from increased incidence rates, severity or duration of GI AEs when treated with first-line extended-release metformin monotherapy. Doses of 2000 mg/day did not increase the severity or duration of GI AEs. (C) 2016 Diabetes India. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
基金:
Bristol-Myers Squibb; Merck Serono Merck & Company
第一作者单位:[1]Department of Endocrinology, Beijing Hospital of the Ministry of Health, Beijing, China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Guo Lixin,Guo Xiaohui,Li Yan,et al.Effects of body mass index or dosage on gastrointestinal disorders associated with extended-release metformin in type 2 diabetes: Sub-analysis of a Phase IV open-label trial in Chinese patients[J].DIABETES & METABOLIC SYNDROME-CLINICAL RESEARCH & REVIEWS.2016,10(3):137-142.doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2016.01.004.
APA:
Guo, Lixin,Guo, Xiaohui,Li, Yan,Hong, Xu,Jiang, Xiaozhen...&Ji, Linong.(2016).Effects of body mass index or dosage on gastrointestinal disorders associated with extended-release metformin in type 2 diabetes: Sub-analysis of a Phase IV open-label trial in Chinese patients.DIABETES & METABOLIC SYNDROME-CLINICAL RESEARCH & REVIEWS,10,(3)
MLA:
Guo, Lixin,et al."Effects of body mass index or dosage on gastrointestinal disorders associated with extended-release metformin in type 2 diabetes: Sub-analysis of a Phase IV open-label trial in Chinese patients".DIABETES & METABOLIC SYNDROME-CLINICAL RESEARCH & REVIEWS 10..3(2016):137-142