高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Combined adductor canal block with periarticular infiltration versus periarticular infiltration for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

单位: [1]Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine [2]Center for Osteonecrosis and Joint Preserving and Reconstruction, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: adductor canal block meta-analysis periarticular infiltration postoperative analgesia total knee arthroplasty

摘要:
Background: Both adductor canal block (ACB) and periarticular infiltration (PI) have been shown to reduce pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without the motor blockade. However, the efficacy and safety of combined ACB with PI (ACB+PI) as compared to PI alone for analgesia after TKA remains controversial. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to compare the effects of ACB+PI with PI alone on pain controll after TKA. Methods: PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify studies comparing ACB+PI with PI alone for TKA patients. The primary outcomes included pain score with rest or activity and morphine consumption. Secondary outcomes were distance walked, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Relevant data were analyzed using RevMan v5.3. Results: Three studies involving 337 patients were included. Combined ACB with PI was associated with longer distances walked than PI alone (MD=7.27, 95% CI: 0.43-14.12, P=0.04) on postoperative day 1. The outcomes of pain, morphine consumption, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were not statistically different between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis suggests that combined ACB with PI may achieve earlier ambulation for patients after TKA without a reduction in analgesia when compared to PI alone in the early postoperative period. There were no significant differences in morphine consumption, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications between the 2 groups. However, owing to the variation of included studies, no firm conclusions can be drawn.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2015]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 医学:内科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 医学:内科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2014]版:
Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
最新[2023]版:
Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均[2021-2025] 出版当年[2014版] 出版当年五年平均[2010-2014] 出版前一年[2013版] 出版后一年[2015版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [2]Center for Osteonecrosis and Joint Preserving and Reconstruction, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China. [*1]Center for Osteonecrosis and Joint Preserving and Reconstruction, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China–Japan Friendship Hospital, 2 Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:1320 今日访问量:0 总访问量:816 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)