单位:[1]Department of Nosocomial Infection Prevention and Control, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.职能科室疾病预防控制与感染管理处疾病预防控制与感染管理处首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院[2]Department of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.医技科室检验科检验科首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院[3]Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院
Background: Different catheter lock solutions (CLSs) are used to reduce catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) for paediatric patients with central venous catheters (CVCs), but the most effective CLS is unknown. Aim: To compare the effectiveness of different CLSs for the prevention of CRBSI in paediatric patients. Methods: Potential studies were searched and selected through the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library up to May 2021. Randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of CLSs for preventing CRBSI in paediatric patients were included. We performed a random-effects network meta-analysis to estimate risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Findings: Thirteen studies comprising 1335 patients were included in the network meta analysis. Taurolidine + heparin was effective in the prevention of CRBSI compared with heparin in paediatric patients (RR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.09-0.51). No significant difference was found between the other CLSs (such as vancomycin, ethanol, fusidic acid, amikacin, and amikacin and vancomycin) and heparin or between different intervention lock solutions for CRBSI prevention. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve, taurolidine + heparin (85.3%) appeared to be the most effective solution for effectiveness on CRBSI prevention, followed by fusidic acid + heparin (77.0%) and amikacin + heparin (65.7%). There was no statistical global inconsistency among the included studies after design by treatment test (chi(2) = 2.22, P=0.137). Conclusion: The study showed that taurolidine lock solution seemed to be the most effective for the prevention of CRBSI in paediatric patients. Well-designed randomized trials in paediatric patients are needed to provide more reliable evidence in the effectiveness of different CLSs. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Healthcare Infection Society.
基金:
Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University [yyqdktgl2021-9]
第一作者单位:[1]Department of Nosocomial Infection Prevention and Control, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Department of Nosocomial Infection Prevention and Control, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.[*1]Department of Nosocomial Infection Prevention and Control, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University. No. 95, Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People’s Republic of China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Guo Qingqing,Lv Zhi,Wang Haiman,et al.Catheter lock solutions for reducing catheter-related bloodstream infections in paediatric patients: a network meta-analysis[J].JOURNAL of HOSPITAL INFECTION.2021,118:40-47.doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2021.09.013.
APA:
Guo Qingqing,Lv Zhi,Wang Haiman,Song Lihong,Liu Yanyu...&Zhou Chunlian.(2021).Catheter lock solutions for reducing catheter-related bloodstream infections in paediatric patients: a network meta-analysis.JOURNAL of HOSPITAL INFECTION,118,
MLA:
Guo Qingqing,et al."Catheter lock solutions for reducing catheter-related bloodstream infections in paediatric patients: a network meta-analysis".JOURNAL of HOSPITAL INFECTION 118.(2021):40-47