高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Left ventricular strain-curve morphology to distinguish between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

单位: [1]Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China [2]Departmentof Radiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China [3]Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing,China [4]Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Constrictive pericarditis Restrictive cardiomyopathy Myocardial strain Time-strain curve patterns Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking

摘要:
Aims To distinguish between constrictive pericarditis (CP) and restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) using cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) left ventricle (LV) diastolic time-strain curve patterns and myocardial strain. Methods and Results A total of 32 CP patients, 27 RCM patients, and 25 control subjects were examined by CMR-FT and analysed for global strain, segmental strain, and LV time-strain curve patterns in the longitudinal, circumferential, and radial directions. Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) strain imaging was performed in some cases. The peak global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global circumferential strain (GCS) of the RCM group were lower than those of the CP group. GLS [median (interquartile range) CP vs. RCM: -11.15 (-12.85, -9.35) vs. -6.5 (-8.75, -4.85), P < 0.001] and GCS (CP vs. RCM: -16.89 +/- 5.11 vs. -13.37 +/- 5.79, P < 0.001). In circumferential and radial directions, the strain ratios of the LV lateral/septal wall (LW/SW) of the CP group were significantly lower than those of the RCM group at the basal and mid segments. The CS ratio of LW/SW at the basal segment [CP vs. RCM: 0.95 (0.85, 1.25) vs. 1.43 (1.18, 1.89), P < 0.001] and mid segment [CP vs. RCM: 1.05 (0.92, 1.15) vs. 1.18 (1.06, 1.49), P = 0.026]. The RS ratio of LW/SW at the basal segment [CP vs. RCM: 0.97 (0.76, 1.37) vs. 1.55 (1.08, 2.31), P = 0.006] and mid segment [CP vs. RCM: 0.95 (0.70, 1.28) vs. 1.79 (1.32, 2.92), P < 0.001]. In the longitudinal and circumferential directions, the characteristic 'plateau' pattern of time-strain curves could be seen in the CP but not in the RCM during the diastole. The GCS ratio of 0-50%/50-75% diastolic period of the CP was higher than that of the RCM [CP vs. RCM: 17.01 (8.67, 23.75) vs. 5.38 (1.93, 11.24), P = 0.001], while the GCS ratio of 50-75%/75-100% diastolic period was lower than that of the RCM [CP vs. RCM: 0.36 (0.15, 1.67) vs. 1.12 (0.70, 5.58), P < 0.001]. The peak GLS (sensitivity, 85%; specificity, 78%) and the GCS ratio of 0-50%/50-75% diastolic period (sensitivity, 88%; specificity, 73%) had higher differential diagnosis value. Conclusions The CMR-FT could distinctly differentiate CP from RCM based on LV myocardial strain and LV time-strain curve patterns. The characteristic 'plateau' pattern of the time-strain curve is specific for CP and not RCM and this curve can also be duplicated by STE.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 心脏和心血管系统
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 心脏和心血管系统
JCR分区:
出版当年[2019]版:
Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
最新[2023]版:
Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均[2021-2025] 出版当年[2019版] 出版当年五年平均[2015-2019] 出版前一年[2018版] 出版后一年[2020版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China [4]Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China [*1]Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing 100029,China and Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:1320 今日访问量:0 总访问量:817 更新日期:2025-05-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)