高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Juvederm Volift (VYC-17.5L), a Hyaluronic Acid Filler with Lidocaine, is Safe and Effective for Correcting Nasolabial Folds in Chinese Subjects

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

单位: [1]Plastic Surgery Department of Shanghai 9th People's Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. [2]Plastic Surgery Department of General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command of PLA, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. [3]Plastic Surgery Department of Japan Friendship Hospital, Chaoyang, Beijing, People's Republic of China. [4]Plastic Surgery Department of Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China. [5]Plastic Surgery Department of Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian, Beijing, People's Republic of China. [6]Allergan Aesthetics, an AbbVie Company, Marlow, UK. [7]Allergan Aesthetics, an AbbVie Company, Beijing, People's Republic of China. [8]Allergan Aesthetics, an AbbVie Company, Irvine, CA, USA.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: hyaluronic acid dermal fillers lidocaine

摘要:
Purpose: Hyaluronic acid injectable gels are commonly used to treat nasolabial folds (NLFs). We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of VYC-17.5L for correcting NLFs in Chinese subjects. Patients and Methods: This prospective, multicenter, double-blind, within-subject-controlled study randomized adults with moderate-to-severe NLFs to VYC-17.5L treatment (initial and touch-up) in 1 NLF and control (without lidocaine) in the contralateral NLF. Effectiveness endpoints at 6 months included noninferiority of VYC-17.5L to control in NLF Severity Scale response rate (primary endpoint), subject-reported procedural pain (11-point scale), and investigator and subject assessments using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Results: A total of 175 subjects were included. The primary endpoint was met, with response rates of 84.2% for VYC-17.5L and 82.5% for control. Mean pain scores after initial and touch-up treatments were 2.4 for VYC-17.5L versus 5.2 for control (P < 0.001) and 2.0 versus 3.3 (P < 0.001), respectively. Investigator-rated GAIS scores were 86.5% for VYC-17.5L versus 86.0% for control. There were no between-group differences in subject-rated GAIS scores. Safety profiles were comparable for VYC-17.5L and control. Conclusion: VYC-17.5L was noninferior to control without lidocaine for correcting moderate-to-severe NLFs in Chinese subjects and was superior to control in reducing procedural pain.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2021]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 皮肤病学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 皮肤病学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
Q3 DERMATOLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q3 DERMATOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均[2021-2025] 出版当年[2020版] 出版当年五年平均[2016-2020] 出版前一年[2019版] 出版后一年[2021版]

第一作者:
第一作者单位: [1]Plastic Surgery Department of Shanghai 9th People's Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Plastic Surgery Department of Shanghai 9th People's Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. [*1]Shanghai 9th People’s Hospital, No. 639, Zizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200011, People’s Republic of China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:1320 今日访问量:0 总访问量:816 更新日期:2025-04-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有:重庆聚合科技有限公司 渝ICP备12007440号-3 地址:重庆市两江新区泰山大道西段8号坤恩国际商务中心16层(401121)